Ref Base – Video Evaluations
Evaluator Email
Date / Time of Match
11/24/2024 11:00 AM
Field Location of Match
PLEASE SELECT
Evaluator Name
Referee Name
Rowdy Davis
Positioning/Movement
2 = Satisfactory
Decision Making/Rules Application
1 = Good
Interaction with Team
1 = Good
Signaling:
1 = Good
Positioning/Movement Comments
Towards the second half's end, there were a few moments where I was stacked and needed to get wider to see a handling offense and a jersey pull. Early on, I didn't really show a ton of energy - I was very center and far from plays when they were moving toward my AR. I need to close that gap sooner rather than later to sell proximity and angle. It looked like when I could, I stayed in the mid-third of the field unless there was a quick increase in pressure in the play. After the ~20' mark, it appeared that I stayed more proximal to play with better angles. I looked more comfortable following that.
Decision Making/Rules Application: Comments
A lot of my decisions were based on the level of the teams - these are EA players and are fine with playing through contact. When I could, I let them play through contact as long as I didn't feel like it was terribly reckless or careless. This can be seen around 9:29 where there is a bit of pushing/grabbing between both teams - very light contact that I might call in DCSL, but not here. I called my first foul at 11:10 because the players indicated they didn't want that contact and it was coming out, so I felt that it would be a good one to give for game management even though it wasn't at my initial foul bar level. No foul call at 12:08, I had contact on ball and the video supports this. I didn't give a handball call around 17:10 because I felt that his arms were natural for his body movement and the time/distance of the ball to him was very small. If i'd removed his arms from the equation, it would hit his head, and cause the same outcome. I had my first caution at 19:48, which I gave for SPA. It set the tone for contact and foul selection for the rest of the match. At ~99:20, I award a foul going in because I had the defender going through the attacker to get a touch on ball. The video supports the defender making contact on the attackers legs prior to touch on ball, thus supporting the CMI decision.
Signaling Coments
I have nothing to add here. I felt cautions were clear and deliberate and hand signals were appropriate.
Interaction with Team Comments
I had a few moments throughout the game where team interaction allowed me to either de-escalate a situation or make the correct decision based on previous contact.
Comments for the Assignor (will not get sent to mentee)
Referee Email
rowdydavis1@outlook.com
Is this form complete?
Yes
Positioning along touchline during active play and staying at the offside line
Position at corner for signaling GK or CK
Accuracy when signaling offside:
Comment on offside signaling
Correct mechanics when signaling for offside
Accuracy when signaling throw-ins
Correct mechanics when signaling throw-ins
Comment on throw-in signaling
Proper hand for carrying the flag when not signaling:
Accuracy and mechanics when signaling fouls in AR’s area:
Accuracy and mechanics when signaling GK and CK
Positioning for a Penalty Kick
4-PK Did Not Occur
Made eye contact with Referee/AR when needed:
1 = Good
Did the referee have the proper jersey and badge and was the jersey tucked in an worn approriatley
Yes
Did the referee wear black shorts
Yes
Did the referee wear black socks that were pulled up just below the knee
Yes
Uniform/Appearance comments
I need to either get a haircut or gel my hair.
Assignor Access Only
Assignor's Password
Entered Into Ref Base
Comments for the Referee
Position of Referee being evaluated
CR
Are you evaluating yourself or someone else?
Self
Key moments (to also be included in referee education)
Time
19:48
Description of the momentsAt 19:48, #11 black fouls the attacking player as he moves towards the penalty area. I awarded the foul to red with the assistance of AR1, and showed a caution to #11 for stopping a promising attack. The conditions for DOGSO were not met as at the time, the player had another defender who could cover the goal, and the direction of the player when fouled did not show that he would have an OBVIOUS goal scoring opportunity. As such, DOGSO was not met and SPA was then awarded.
Time
19:48
Description of the moments
At 19:48, #11 black fouls the attacking player as he moves towards the penalty area. I awarded the foul to red with the assistance of AR1, and showed a caution to #11 for stopping a promising attack. The conditions for DOGSO were not met as at the time, the player had another defender who could cover the goal, and the direction of the player when fouled did not show that he would have an OBVIOUS goal scoring opportunity. As such, DOGSO was not met and SPA was then awarded.
Match Number
71783
Assign an Evaluator (assignor only)
Post Meeting Notes (please list the date and time you meet and any commentsO
Have you met with the Referee?
Match Report
Referee Profile
Message to Referee to invite them to meeting
Is this a youth Referee?
Parent Email
Send Referee Meeting Invitation
Entry Update Date
November 27, 2024